mindoreo.blogg.se - Pdf shaper vs foxit reader

Pdf shaper vs foxit reader pdf#
Pdf shaper vs foxit reader full#
Pdf shaper vs foxit reader software#
Pdf shaper vs foxit reader free#

Also creates a folder in Public/Documents of unknown purpose (it's empty). Some features such as number of results are hidden in basic search but can be seen with the Advanced Search button. A major strength of Foxit is its search function, which has all of Adobe's functionality while being much faster. It provides a lot of customisation, but some defaults aren't great-I would prefer that long bookmarks were word wrapped by default. Some which might be of interest are the "Search and Highlight" function which will highlight all instances of a particular word, as well as "Rotate view" which easily deals with wrongly orientated scans (though this is only a view option and does not translate into the saved file). It has a Microsoft Office-like toolbar with many tools and customisation options, all labelled for your convenience.

Pdf shaper vs foxit reader pdf#

Foxit PDF Reader: More customisation and fast searchingįoxit is another big name and well known enough to make it onto Ninite. Overall I would say that it's a pretty neat standard tool that works great for a casual user, though it may run into issues with less typical documents. There are also some quirks I've found: Clicking tools such as highlight may cause brief freezing on large scanned documents, and some files are set to a very slow scroll when opened (this issue is fixed by selecting "fit to width scaling" and then switching your zoom back to what you want). It lacks a few features that are present elsewhere such as the ability to hide all annotations (a feature present in every other reader here). The yellow highlight is also less bright, which makes things easier on the eyes, and the colour gets darker if highlights overlap each other (other readers do not do this). Advanced search also shows you a list of results in the document and can search multiple documents. The search function is of standard speed and has features such as case matching, whole word, number of results, and page numbers of search progress bar. There is a sidebar teasing you with premium features but it can be hidden from view. All important tools are accessible without needing to click through toolbar tabs. One strength of Adobe Reader is that it has a very compact UI. It is an interesting choice that some might prefer, but it is worth noting that this does not work for Type 5 documents, whereas the area highlight feature bypasses this restriction. If the line drawn is straight enough, it will correct it to a horizontal or vertical rounded rectangle. Adobe Reader allows you to use the highlight tool but changes its behaviour so that it's basically a freedraw round brush.

Pdf shaper vs foxit reader free#

Other PDF readers will not let you use the regular highlight tool but offer an "Area highlight" tool instead which allows free draw of rectangles.

Pdf shaper vs foxit reader software#

One interesting difference between it and other software is in how it deals with Type 4 and 5 documents. Adobe reader is generally a good enough tool for what you would need to do, though it has its own quirks and drawbacks. This is probably everybody's first option since PDFs are automatically associated with Adobe.

So without further ado: Adobe Acrobat Reader DC: Compact functionality In addition, sometimes you also run into scans that are in the wrong orientation and need to be rotated, which requires its own tools.

Scanned documents that cannot even be highlighted by Adobe Reader (might be some sort of protection).

Scanned documents where the text is not recognised.

Scanned documents that have highlightable text, but the highlight and search seem to think the words are sometimes on different positions than they actually are, leading to highlights that run on from the line or skip portions of the text.

Scanned documents that have accurately highlightable text.

To elaborate on "awkward files", what I mean is that student readings fall into five rough types: These requirements disqualify quite a number of the very light readers. All software chosen are also capable of signing documents and do not require signup. I focus on student-relevant details such as a good UI, highlighting, search, and the ability to handle all sorts of awkward files you might encounter.

Pdf shaper vs foxit reader full#

This comparison is written for university students and those in similar positions who want a free PDF reader but do not need the full features of a PDF editor. So I tested them out myself and made a writeup that I hope helps others in my position. The current web results for this are disappointing to say the least, with review sites doing very little to highlight what makes each reader unique and really comparing features people care about, not to mention frequently omitting major options. I've recently been doing a whole bunch of research into software for each purpose, and PDF readers are one of the staples.